Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¾Ç°üÀýÀå¾Ö ȯÀÚÀÇ. ÀÓ»ó ¹× Ãø»çÀ§°æµÎ°³ ÃÔ¿µ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Áø´Ü°ú ÀÚ±â°ø¸í¿µ»ó¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Áø´ÜÀÇ ºñ±³¿¬±¸

VALIDITY OF CLINICAL, TRANSCRANIAL RADIOGRAPHIC AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING METHOD IN THE TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1991³â 21±Ç 2È£ p.327 ~ 339
ÃÖÁ¤Èñ, ±èÁøÇü,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÃÖÁ¤Èñ (  ) - ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
±èÁøÇü (  ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼±Çб³½Ç

Abstract

1990³â 10¿ùºÎÅÍ 1591³â 10¿ù±îÁö ¾Ç°üÀýÁúȯÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ Àü³²´ëÇб³º´¿ø Ä¡°ú¿¡ ³»¿øÇÑ 21
¸íÀÇ 42¾Ç°üÀýÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¾Ç°üÀýÀå¾Ö¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ Áõ»óÀ» Á¶»çÇÏ¿© ÀÓ»óÀû Áø´ÜÀ» ³»¸®°í, Ãø
»çÀ§°æµÎ°³»ó°ú ÀÚ±â°ø¸í»óÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© °¢°¢ Áø´ÜÇÑ ÈÄ ÀÚ±â°ø¸í»ó¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Áø´ÜÀ» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î
ÀÓ»óÁø´Ü ¹× Ãø»çÀ§°æµÎ°³»ó¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Áø´Ü Á¤È®µµ¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÚ±â°ø¸í»ó Áø´Ü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÓ
»óÁø´ÜÀÇ sensitivity´Â 0.77ÀÌ°í, specificity´Â 0.63À̾úÀ¸¸ç, ÀÚ±â°ø¸í»ó Áø´Ü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Ãø»çÀ§
°æµÎ°³»ó Áø´ÜÀÇ sensitivity´Â 0.53À̾ú°í, specificity´Â 0.75¿´´Ù. ÀÌ¿Í °°ÀÌ ÀÓ»ó ¹× Ãø»çÀ§
°æµÎ°³»ó¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¾Ç°üÀýÀå¾ÖÆÇÁ¤Àº ±× Á¤È®¼ºÀÌ »ó´çÈ÷ Àǽɽº·¯¿ü´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ÀúÀÚ´Â Á¶Á÷
°£ÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ ½±°Ô ÀÎÁöÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°í °üÀý¿øÆÇÀ» Á÷Á¢ °üÂûÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾î ¾Ç°üÀýÀå¾Ö¸¦ ¿ëÀÌÇÏ°Ô
Áø´ÜÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÀÚ±â°ø¸í¿µ»óÀÇ ÀûÀýÇÑ ÀÌ¿ëÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù°í °á·Ð ³»·È´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The Purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity among the clinical,
transcranial, radiographic and MRI diagnosis in internal derangement of the
temporomandibular joint. Fourty two temporomandibular joints were assessed in twenty
one patients who visited the dental department of Chonnam National University Hospital
with the complaint of temporomandibular disorder from Oct. 1990 to Oct. 1991.
The results were as follows:
1. In the clinically symptomatic 29 TMJs, 26 (89.7%) joints reveal disc displacement
and 3 (10.3%) joints reveal normal disc position on MRI. The sensitivity of clinical
diagnosis was 0.77, and the specificity was 0.63.
2. In the normal 22 TMJs on the transcranial radiographic finding, 16 (72.7%) joints
reveal disc displacement, and 6 (27.3%) joints reveal normal disc position on MRI. In the
abnormal 20 TMJs on the transcranial radiographic finding, 18 (90%) joints reveal disc
displacement, and 2 (10%) joints reveal normal disc position on MRI. The sensitivity of
transcranial radiograph was 0.53, and the specificity was 0.75.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸